Freud's text starts with a clear and concise epistemological explanation, which we could say that is ahead of his time. This master invites us to join him in the efforts to build up a theory about the unconscious experience, discovered by him, and why not, also invites us to continue his journey. But in Psychoanalysis we are warned in advance that it's not the case, it's not like that with Freud. In this work I intend to make a lecture of " Instincts and their Vicissitudes " in detail, focusing on small pieces which, from my point of view, are problematic, hard to define and I would even say that they leave me with a certain feeling of dissatisfaction, considering what one could expect, in other fields, from the text of a master: definitions, explanations, systematically considered schemas with no conceptual gaps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |